https://rpio.psychopen.eu/index.php/rpio/issue/feed Research for People in Organizations 2026-09-22T07:22:03+00:00 Annette Kluge, Vera Hagemann, Marcel Kern editors@rpio.psychopen.eu Open Journal Systems <h1>Research for People in Organizations</h1> <h2 class="mt-0">Pioneering psychological research, prioritizing the human element in organizational practices — <em>Free of charge for authors and readers</em></h2> <p>We are an open-access, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the promotion and advancement of individuals, teams, and organizations, with a particular <strong>focus on the European workforce</strong>. We aim to provide a platform for both <strong>qualitative and quantitative research</strong> that empowers individuals to flourish in their work environments. With a strong emphasis on research based on <strong>open science principles</strong>, our journal endeavors to tackle the myriad challenges and opportunities encountered by individuals in today's dynamic workplaces. Thus, the journal is committed to publishing research that explicitly aligns with the United Nations' sustainable development goal of promoting "decent work and economic growth" (SDG 8).</p> https://rpio.psychopen.eu/index.php/rpio/article/view/20443 When Less Isn’t More: Swiss Managers’ Gendered Perceptions of Part-Time Work 2026-09-22T07:22:03+00:00 Barbara Jarmila Germann barbara.germann@fhnw.ch Dörte Resch barbara.germann@fhnw.ch <p><strong>Aims of the Study:</strong> This study investigates how Swiss managers and HR professionals, referred to as organizational decision-makers, perceive part-time work at the intersection of traditional gender norms and increasing work-life balance emphasis. Specifically, it examines whether part-time work is viewed as a signal of lacking career commitment and how these perceptions differ depending on the gender of both the employee and the organizational decision-maker. <strong>Method:</strong> We conducted an exploratory mixed-methods study, combining qualitative interviews with twelve participants and an online quantitative survey of 119 organizational decision-makers. The survey measured whether part-time work is perceived as a sign of lacking career commitment. Regression analyses examined the effects of both decision-makers’ and part-time employees’ gender on these evaluations. <strong>Results:</strong> The majority of decision-makers did not interpret part-time work as a sign of low career commitment, and work–life balance discourses have increasingly entered organizational talk. Nonetheless, evaluations of part-time work remain gendered: Male part-time work is significantly more likely than female part-time work to be perceived as a signal of low career commitment, a pattern particularly pronounced among male decision-makers and in male-dominated fields. <strong>Conclusion:</strong> These findings highlight that gendered assumptions about part-timers’ career commitment continue to shape organizational decision-makers’ evaluations, particularly disadvantaging male part-time employees. Notably, decision-makers appear aware of this gendered reality, yet rarely acknowledge their own role in changing it, allowing gendered power relations to be reproduced. This underscores that simply offering flexible work policies is insufficient to improve work-life balance without simultaneously addressing underlying gendered discourses.</p> 2026-09-22T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Research for People in Organizations https://rpio.psychopen.eu/index.php/rpio/article/view/17157 Working With AI: How Team Cohesion Depends on Perceiving the AI as a Tool or a Partner 2026-03-11T02:55:22+00:00 Maja Hoffmann maja.hoffmann-b3f@ruhr-uni-bochum.de Coraly Wollstein maja.hoffmann-b3f@ruhr-uni-bochum.de Fiona Zimber maja.hoffmann-b3f@ruhr-uni-bochum.de Alina Tausch maja.hoffmann-b3f@ruhr-uni-bochum.de <p>With artificial intelligence (AI) getting more integrated into working life, the question is how to use it in a human-centered way to promote resources such as team cohesion, belonging, and support. While these factors are crucial to reaching common targets, not every AI system and application raises the same expectations to provide those resources. This online vignette study aims to answer the question how different role conceptualizations of AI can influence team cohesion in a hybrid team. Two hundred and seventeen (217) participants were randomly divided into two experimental conditions, i.e., to work with AI as a teammate or as a tool. They were then asked to evaluate their team perception while working with the AI, and their trust in the system. While the vignette manipulation of the different AI framings was unsuccessful, further analyses were carried out by separating the participants using their own rating of the AI role. The results show that team cohesion is significantly higher when AI is perceived as a teammate. Moreover, trust in AI has a significant influence on the team perception. Perceiving AI as a teammate leads to higher team cohesion compared to seeing it as a tool, moderated by the participant’s trust in the AI.</p> 2026-03-11T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Research for People in Organizations https://rpio.psychopen.eu/index.php/rpio/article/view/16191 Volunteering in Organizations: A New Task for Human Resource Development? 2025-12-08T23:07:14+00:00 Elisabeth Kals elisabeth.kals@ku.de Svenja C. Schütt elisabeth.kals@ku.de Isabel T. Strubel elisabeth.kals@ku.de <p>Volunteering is increasingly viewed as crucial for personal and organizational growth. Employers value volunteer experience, and scholarships frequently require proof of volunteering, underscoring its importance for skill development and career progress. This paper investigates the proposition that volunteering can be a valuable addition to human resource (HR) development. It begins by defining volunteering within an HR context and analyzing the advantages and challenges it presents to employees and organizations. The article then investigates the motivational structure of volunteering, which is shown to be driven by multiple motives, often overlapping with those in paid jobs. This finding indicates that similar psychological factors influence volunteering and paid work. The positive spillover effects of corporate volunteering in profit and non-profit organizations enhance its desirability. However, its implications for human resource development remain underexplored. Considering volunteering from an HR perspective allows organizations to better understand how voluntary engagement can contribute to skill development, value alignment, and long-term employability. Thus, this perspective enables a more strategic integration of volunteering into learning and development agendas, also to integrate volunteering in internal structures and culture. To preserve the voluntary nature of voluntary activities and avoid instrumentalization, a humanistic approach centered on empathy and unconditional appreciation for volunteers is recommended. Organizations should seek volunteering experience from job candidates while actively supporting and facilitating volunteer opportunities, taking responsibility for a robust system.</p> 2025-11-28T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2025 Research for People in Organizations https://rpio.psychopen.eu/index.php/rpio/article/view/18551 Shaping the Future of Organizational Research in a Rapidly Changing World of Work: Our Visions and Goals for “Research for People in Organizations” 2025-09-28T23:50:44+00:00 Vera Hagemann annette.kluge@ruhr-uni-bochum.de Marcel Kern annette.kluge@ruhr-uni-bochum.de Annette Kluge annette.kluge@ruhr-uni-bochum.de <p>not applicable</p> 2025-09-29T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2025 Research for People in Organizations https://rpio.psychopen.eu/index.php/rpio/article/view/16597 Beyond the Emptiness Machine: New Directions for Leadership Research in Digital and AI-Driven Work Contexts 2025-09-09T03:27:30+00:00 Fabiola H. Gerpott fabiola.gerpott@whu.edu Birgit Schyns fabiola.gerpott@whu.edu <p>In an era where many individuals have transitioned to hybrid or fully remote work models, often supported or managed by artificial intelligence (AI), and confronted with a seemingly endless stream of tasks, there is a growing fear of being consumed by the “emptiness machine” — a metaphor for the hollow substitute technology creates in place of rich human connections essential for experiencing social influence. These shifts in work design have important implications for leadership: While virtual communication and AI can enhance autonomy and efficiency, they may also weaken relational energy — the “social glue” that supports social influence — potentially contributing to a growing sense of workplace loneliness. Consistently considering contrasting aspects, we examine two key work design shifts that reshape leadership: (1) the structural changes brought by hybrid and remote work models, and (2) the content-related shifts in leadership tasks driven by the transformative impact of AI. By offering concrete research questions in these areas and outlining practical implications, we aim to inspire a more holistic understanding of leadership in a technologically transformed world.</p> 2025-09-09T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2025 Research for People in Organizations